Best Lawyers in Chennai | Top Law Firms | Leading Legal Consultants | What are the key factors that courts consider in judicial review proceedings?

1 post

Judicial Review of Regulatory Decisions: Reviewing regulatory actions in Appellate Courts

Judicial Review of Regulatory Decisions: Reviewing regulatory actions in Appellate Courts

Judicial Review of Regulatory Decisions: In a modern democratic society, administrative agencies wield significant power in regulating various sectors of the economy.1 However, this power is not absolute. To ensure accountability and prevent arbitrary decision-making, the judiciary plays a crucial role through the mechanism of judicial review.2 This legal doctrine allows courts to scrutinize the actions of administrative agencies and ensure they act within the confines of the law and adhere to principles of fairness and procedural propriety.3 This article delves into the intricacies of judicial review of regulatory decisions, emphasizing the significance of appellate courts in this process, and highlighting the expertise of Rajendra Law Office LLP, a premier law firm in Chennai, in navigating these complex legal challenges. Judicial Review of Regulatory Decisions: Reviewing regulatory actions in Appellate Courts: Rajendra Law Office LLP The Scope of Judicial Review Judicial review empowers courts to examine administrative decisions and actions to determine whether they are: The Role of Appellate Courts Appellate courts play a pivotal role in the judicial review process. They act as a crucial check on the decisions of lower courts and administrative tribunals.7 When a party is dissatisfied with the outcome of a judicial review proceeding at the lower court level, they can appeal the decision to a higher court.8 Appellate courts perform several crucial functions in this context: Rajendra Law Office LLP: Expertise in Appellate Litigation Rajendra Law Office LLP, a leading law firm in Chennai, possesses a distinguished track record in handling complex legal matters, […]