In a recent landmark decision, the Madras High Court issued a ruling that could have significant implications for government employees facing suspension while criminal investigations are pending. The Employee Suspension case involved D. Jayakumar, a police officer who had been placed on administrative leave during an ongoing bribery investigation. Madras High Court Rules on Police Officer’s Suspension A Precedent-Setting Judgment The judgment, delivered by Justices R. Suresh Kumar and K. Kumaresk Babu, marks a turning point in the handling of employee suspensions in cases where criminal prosecutions are pending. The case at the center of this ruling dates back to February 7, 2011, when a Special Sub-Inspector of Police faced termination from his job following allegations of receiving a bribe from the Vigilance and Anti-Corruption Department. Consequently, he found himself entangled in a criminal charge. Lengthy Suspension Battle Jayakumar initially contested his suspension by appealing to an Appellate Authority. However, on March 27, 2014, his appeal was dismissed. Undeterred, he submitted a second appeal to the Joint Commissioner of Police’s office, but this too was denied on June 22, 2016. The authorities argued that the ongoing criminal case and their belief that reinstatement would not be prudent until the matter was resolved justified the continuation of the suspension. Court’s Key Determinations The Madras High Court’s ruling brings clarity to the matter. The court emphasized that suspensions solely based on the status of criminal cases should not be extended indefinitely without a valid reason. Justice R. Suresh Kumar, in his verdict, […]
News Tags: Are there alternatives to indefinite employee suspension?
1 post
