Wearing Hijab and its Controversy: In the controversial case of Fatima Bushra Vs the state of Karnataka Spreading all over the Country, a petition has been filed by a Muslim student of Government, PU college Udupi District of Karnataka. Petition has been filed before the High court of Karnataka A petition has been filed before the High court of Karnataka by one Fatima Bushra, a Muslim student where’s The petitioner and the other students are denied by the authority to enter into the school by wearing hijab (headscarf) as per the G.O. of the state. But the petitioner instituted that the G.O. is not within the purview of the power prescribed under the Karnataka Education Act 1963. There does not have no specific rules regarding the uniform of Pre University students. Denying entry of the school students from attending their regular classes on the basis of their religious belief and faith in wearing apparel is a pure violation of Fundamental Rights of article 14, 19(1)(a), 21, 25, 29 of the constitution. Wearing Hijab and its Controversy: Best Rated 10 Lawyers in Chennai India is a secular country where every people have the right to profess and practice their religious beliefs. The HC said that by wearing Hijab they are not violating any fundamental right of other people, wearing Hijab is an essential practice followed by Muslim Women. Justice Hegde referred to Puttaswamy Judgement and quoted that freedom given to a certain group to determine their appearance and apparel is protected […]
News
The apex court, in a hearing involving multiple petitioners such as Karti Chidambaram and Anil Deshmukh, scrutinized the validity of procedures specified in the Prevention of Money Laundering Act. A bench of Supreme Court judges, including Justice A.M. Khanwilkar, Dinesh Maheshwari, and C.T. Ravi Kumar, concluded that money laundering is a crime that significantly harms the country’s economy and financial system. It has the potential to paralyze or even derail the economy, making it even more severe than murder. This is why a special Act, the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA), was enacted to address and combat this serious offense. In essence, the court emphasized that money laundering is a graver crime than murder. Supreme Court’s Landmark Ruling on Money Laundering: A Crime More Severe than Murder The Supreme Court made a noteworthy observation, emphasizing that money laundering isn’t a minor crime; it’s a first-degree crime, more serious than murder. This is due to its association with activities like drug trading and terrorism, which challenge the country’s integrity and sovereignty. The matter was brought before the Apex court to assess the validity of various provisions in the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, as they were alleged to violate both natural justice principles under the Indian Constitution and various criminal laws. Money laundering isn’t a trivial offense; it falls within the category of more severe and heinous crimes, surpassing even murder in its impact. The entire financial well-being of a country hinges on its economy, which can be derailed by […]
Chennai, Jan 8 (PTI): found an error in the Police Commissioner’s orders in greater Chennai in Detaining a man under the Law of Goondas, the division bench from Madras High Court had set aside the arrangement. Human Detention Under Goondas Act Quashed in Madras HC Obviously, the intimidation of arrest is not translated correctly in vernacular. Therefore, the arrangement of detention that will be reduced tends to be set aside to this soil, the division bench from Judge P n Prakash and R N Manjula. The bench allowed Habeas Corpus petition from Parthasarathy, challenging his son Manikandan aka the detention under the Law of Goondas on Friday. Among other things, the Petitioner argues that the invigimity of the arrest has not been translated correctly in vernacular. Detention Authority, while holding back Detenu, has not provided a copy of the document that can be read by it. This seizes the detenu from making the effective representation, the applicant is debated. Other Legal News “It is clear that the installation of the arrest has not been translated correctly in vernacular Other cases, benches. Added.
Second AgniPariksha Plaintiff does not need to undergo ‘Second AgniPariksha’ according to Malicious prosecution. The defendant had to let go of the onus once shifted to him: Madras High Court Assessment relating to the ‘proof burden’ in evil prosecution, Madras High Court In a significant assessment relating to the ‘proof burden’ in evil prosecution, Madras High Court has argued. It argued that the plaintiff needs not to undergo ‘AgniPariksha’ a second time. It is the defendant who has to let go of his responsibilities as soon as it shifts to him. The judge observed that there was no doubt that the initial burden of evidence was only on the plaintiff. Mere release in the alleged false case by itself was not enough. He’s obliged to prove that the prosecution is without “reasonable causes and possibilities”. He must prove that it was with evil intentions and that he suffered damage. Satdeo Prasad v. Ram Narayan, Air 1969 Yet, Plaintiff cannot be called to prove the negative. The Reliance was on Satdeo Prasad v. Ram Narayan, Air 1969 Pat 10. He held that when the accusation of the plaintiff was the same as the violations claimed by the defendant. He had seen it committing and the trial ended in merit. The assumption was that there was no reasonable reason. There was no possibility of allegations. In the instant case, the defendant had determined criminal law on the Plaintiff. He determined by accusing Plaintiff that he entered his shop, brandishing a knife, and […]
Petition submitted before Bombay High Court seeks waiver of property tax, renewal fee. The petition submitted by the FRTWA quoted a large loss. FRTWA – Federation of Retail Traders Welfare Association. They faced financial instability and mass unemployment. They deal with items that are not essential during the lockdown. To waive property tax and license fees A plea submitted before the Bombay High Court seeks to waive property tax and license fees. They seek relief from the state of Maharashtra. They demand for all lockdown periods starting from March 2020. The petition submitted by the FRTWA, cites large losses, financial instability. They faced unemployment of the masses. The retail sector faced crises. As they deal with items that are not essential, they face the direct consequences of the lockdown. The petition submitted was through the Advocate Dipesh Siroya. The state of Maharashtra, Brihanmumbai Municipal Corporation, and the Ministry of Revenue and Forests, Disaster Management, Relief, and Rehabilitation were respondents. e-commerce service providers The applicant highlights the various lockdown by the state. And also by the central government from March 2020. The sequence clarifies that all shops except important service providers must remain closed. The e-commerce service providers are permitted to provide only essentialservices. The petitioner handed over the petition. It stated that they supported the government lockdown. In return, there was no reciprocal subsidy for the closing. More than 13 lakh retailers has around 45 Lakh employees. They depend on the retail industry suffered. Retailers must pay salaries, least electricity, […]
