First, Observing that the tribunals were in a “sad” condition. They could not let go of their functions due to a large number of vacancies. Moreover, The Supreme Court on Monday asked the center to take quick steps to appoint a fresh meeting.
The Tribunals are in a sad condition, making an appointment without determining the term of office: SC to the Center.
Second, Noting that the center has provided guarantees three times in the past year. Justice L Nageswara Rao, Hemant Gupta, and S Ravindra Bhat said that the appointment was not made. The number of vacancies increased in various courts in particular and “sad situation”.
Attorney General KK Venugopal told the bench that the delay. The delay was due to the contrast between the previous court ruling. The ordinance brought by the center. It had ordered the issue of tenure of the members of the tribunal. The SC said that the tenure must be five years old but it was four years. He said that regulation’s delayed in SC.
The Bench said that there was no point in holding an appointment in this regard. It asked the government to appoint members without determining their term of office. The court said that the appointment would be subject to the final results of the case of the term of office.
Attorney general to take instructions on the steps taken for the Company Law tribunal
It also asked the Attorney general to take instructions on the steps taken for the Company Law tribunal. It asked whether the existing members could be re-appointed after the term of office.
The Madras Bar Association has moved to Supreme Court. It challenging sections 12 and 13 of the tribunal reforms (rationalization and conditions of services) of ordinances, 2021. It also challenged Section 184 and 186 (2) of the Finance Act, 2017.
The Ordinance did go with a certain appellate tribunal. The Film Certification Appellate Tribunal (FCAT) came into existence to hear the appeal of filmmakers. Their functions move to other existing justice bodies.
Geographical Indications of Goods (Registration and Protection) Act
It has made amendments to the Cinematograph Act, Copyright Act, Customs Act, Patent Law, Indian Airport Law. By the way, It also amended the Trademark Law, Geographical Indications of Goods (Registration and Protection) Act.
It amended the Protection of plant varieties and farmer rights Act, national highway control (land and traffic), and finance activities. In the Cinematograph Act, the Appellate Agency will now be a high court.
The FCAT, a statute for hearing appeals from filmmakers harmed by the CBFC, serves this purpose. In February, the government introduced a bill aimed at abolishing courts where the broader community isn’t a litigant. However, since the bill didn’t receive parliamentary approval, an ordinance was enacted instead.
Ordinance of the Ministry of Law and Justice, on April 4.
Read More
- Best Attorneys in Chennai
- Safety of grooms in terms cheating from bride side after marriage
- Arbitrator May Use Own Knowledge And Expertise To Arrive At Conclusion But Must Allow Parties To Present Their Case: Madras HC
- How to Handle Intellectual Property Issues in Chennai?
- Applying for SC Certificate for the new 1st Generation Certificate
- 10 PC Quota for Pondy Govt Students in Medical colleges Illegal: Center to HC
- IMPORTANT COURT TERMS :-
Popular News:
- Tribunals making an appointment without determining the term of office: SC to the Center.
- Petition submitted before Bombay High Court seeks waiver of property tax, renewal fee.
- Human Detention Under Goondas Act Quashed in Madras HC
